Climate Change 2001:
Working Group III: Mitigation
Other reports in this collection

7.6.5 Categorization of Climate Change Mitigation Options

An overview of how the different modelling approaches address the main categories of policies is given here in preparation for a discussion of the main assumptions behind study results. The main categories of climate change mitigation options include:

  1. Market oriented policies:

  3. Technology oriented policies:


  4. Voluntary policies:

  6. R&D policies:

  8. Accompanying measures:

While climate policies can include elements of all four policies, most analytical approaches focus on a few of the options. Economic models, for instance, mainly assess market-oriented policies, and occasionally technology policies related to energy supply options. Engineering approaches primarily focus on supply- and demand-side technology policies. Both of these approaches have opportunities to expand their representation of R&D policies.

Table 7.3 shows the application of market-oriented, technology-oriented and voluntary climate policies in different analytical approaches. The schematic overview covers a large number of applications in global, regional, national, and local analyses. Chapters 8 and 9 of discuss the actual details and specific methods for different assessment levels. A few general conclusions on the representation of different climate policies in the analytical approaches are:

It is expected that the cost of climate change mitigation policies–all else being equal–decreases with the number of policy categories and options included in the analysis. This means that approaches that are either rich in detail (or facilitate great flexibility) in a number of policy areas can be expected to identify relatively large mitigation potentials and relatively low costs compared with approaches that only address a few instruments or options.

A number of studies have assessed climate change mitigation costs given different regimes of global flexibility mechanism.21 Climate change mitigation costs in these different policy regimes depend on the specific definition of the policy instrument, and on assumptions about market scale, competition, and restrictions. It is generally expected that climate change mitigation costs decrease with increasing supply of carbon-reduction projects.22 Restrictions on this supply, or market imperfections in global markets for carbon-reduction projects, have a tendency to increase the “price” of the projects (Burniaux, 1998; Mensbrugge, 1998).

Table 7.3: Application of climate change mitigation policies in different analytical approaches
  Market-oriented policies Technology-oriented policies Voluntary-oriented policies
Macroeconomic models      
IO models
All instruments difficulties
with modelling of
transaction costs
CGE: Exogenous assumptions;
few examples with endogenou
Demand functions for ecological values


simulation and/or
scenario models
Exogenous Exogenous, learning Qualitative assumptions

Sectoral models
Partial equilibrium All instruments Changes in capital stock Exogenous demand function for
ecological values
Technology-driven models All instruments modelled
through changes in
capital stock
Exogenous assumptions on
standards and R&D
Leaning curves
Investments reflect future expectations
on ecological values and policies


Project assessment
Cost–benefit analysis All instruments Exogenous technology data Exogenous demand function for
ecological values
Cost-effectiveness analyses All instruments Vintage models  

Technology assessment
No instruments    

Other reports in this collection